[2025:RJ-JP:42936] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16014/2025 Dr. Govind Sharan Sharma S/o Kedar Nath Parashar, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Near Petrol Pump, Old Truck Union, Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Dy. Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Director Ayurveda, Directorate Of Ayurveda, Ajmer. 5. Director, Pension And Pension Welfare, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neetu Bhansali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Parth Sharma Mr. Aaditya Godara, AAAG with Ms. Saba Naaz & Mr. Harshit Verma for Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025 1. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 whereas Aditya Godara accepts notice on behalf of Ms. Mahi Yadav accepts notice for respondent No.5. [2025:RJ-JP:42936] (2 of 2) [CW-16014/2025] 2. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma and Ms. Mahi Yadav as counsel for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner placed reliance upon judgment dated 13.07.2022, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13496/2021 titled as Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and order dated 13.08.2025 in DB Writ Petition No. 9910/2025 titlled as Dr. Sukhram And Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and submits that this writ petition be disposed of in accordance with judgment, as decided by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned AAG, Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma and he submits that recently a SLP (Civil) filed by State of Rajasthan in bunch of matters, wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court has referred the issue to a larger Bench and till disposal by the larger Bench an interim order was passed and he has no objection in case this writ petition is disposed of in accordance with judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court. 5. Having considered aforesaid and also the judgments as referred hereinabove, the writ petition is disposed of on terms as directed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (c) No. 9563/2024 order dated 17.10.2025 (State of Raj. And Ors. Vs. Anisur Rahman). The petitioner is entitled to benefits as directed by Hon’ble Supreme Court. 6. With aforesaid, the instant writ petition stands disposed with pending application(s), if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /12