HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 414 of 2025 (S/S) Kamlapati Sanwal and others ….......Petitioners Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others …..... Respondents Present : Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for respondent nos.3 to 7. JUDGMENT Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The challenge in this petition is made to certain orders, by which, the Grade Pay of the petitioners have been reduced and certain orders were passed. The petitioners also claim that their amount of gratuity and encashment may be re-calculated based on the admissible Grade Pay. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 12.02.2025, passed by this Court in WPSS No.446 of 2020, Lalit Chandra Tiwari and others vs. State of Uttarakhand and others; and connected cases. 2 4. Learned counsel for the respondents admit these facts. 5. Since, the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 12.02.2025, passed by this Court in WPSS No.446 of 2020, Lalit Chandra Tiwari and others vs. State of Uttarakhand and others; and connected cases. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 26.03.2025 Sanjay