PREMSHANKAR @ SHANKARLAL S/O MANNALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1089/2025 · 2025-02-03
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4349 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4349 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4671] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1089/2025 Premshankar @ Shankarlal S/o Mannalal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Baba Ramdev Mandir Ke Pass Uppar Gaon, Taleda, District Bundi (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 03/02/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.06/2025 registered at Police Station Talera, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) and 333 of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the injuries sustained to injured Ramprasad, Pritam and Ramlakhan were not found to be dangerous to life. The injuries sustained to all the injured were simple blunt in nature except injury caused to Ramprasad at his wrist which was found to be simple grievous in nature. The injuries sustained to injured Ramlakhan at his forehead was also found to be simple blunt in nature, prima-facie the offences under Section 109 of BNS is not made out against the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is relative of the complainant and exaggerated the story. The accused-
[2025:RJ-JP:4671] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1089/2025] petitioner is in custody since long and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the injuries sustained to all the injured were found to be simple blunt in nature except the injuries caused to injured Ramprasad at his wrist which was found to be grievous in nature. The injuries caused to injured Ramlakhan at his forehead was also found to be simple blunt in nature. There is no injury which is dangerous to life or at vital parts, therefore, considering the above facts and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Premshankar @ Shankarlal S/o Mannalal in connection with FIR No.06/2025 registered at Police Station Talera, District Bundi shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/252