M/s Lappa Construction and Supply v. The State of AP and 5 Ors
WP(C)/124/2025 · 2025-04-30
Manash Ranjan Pathak
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4349 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4349 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040004462025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/124/2025 M/s Lappa Construction and Supply represented by its sole proprietor Shri Tajen Kamum, Son of Tali Kamum, resident of Old Market, Basar, PO and PS Basar, Leparada District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors through the Secretary, Public Works Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Central Zone B Public Works Department Pasighat East Siang District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Public Works Department Basar Leparada District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Public Works Department Basar Division Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh.
Page No.# 2/3 5:The Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Finance Planning and Investment Department Planning and Investment Division Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 6:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Basar Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Kamal Saxena, Eddie Payeng Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
ORDER Date : 01-05-2025 Ms. M. Bori, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K. Saxena,
learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions submitted that the issues involved in this writ petition has already been settled and as such, she prays for withdrawal of this writ petition, with liberty to approach the appropriate forum as and when fresh cause of action arises, to which, Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents has no objection. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
Page No.# 3/3 Liberty as prayed for, so granted. JUDGE Comparing Assistant