APHC010106362007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. R. SURI BABU, NMR O/O THE DY. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ DN., NASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 1. STATE OF AP REP BYPRL SECY PANCHAYAT 3 OTHERS, &RURAL DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF PANCHAYATRAJ, ERRAM MANZIL, HYDERABAD 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ, NASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ, SUB NASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT' Petition under Article circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or Direction in the nature otherwise declaring G.O.Rt.No.1761 Panchayat Raj & Department dt.12-12-2006 issued by the 1st respondent and consequential proceedings Rc.No.NMR/JA/94 respondent in so far as it relates to permission by the 1st remove the petitioner from s petitioner by the 4th respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 5989/2007 R. SURI BABU, NMR O/O THE DY. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ DN., NASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND STATE OF AP REP BYPRL SECY PANCHAYAT 3 OTHERS, &RURAL DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIT, HYDERABAD. ENGINEERINCHIEF PANCHAYATRAJ, ERRAM MANZIL, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ, NASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ, SUB NASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT' ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a Writ order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring G.O.Rt.No.1761 Panchayat Raj & rural Development 2006 issued by the 1st respondent and consequential Rc.No.NMR/JA/94-95 dt.26-12-2006 issued by the 4th in so far as it relates to permission by the 1st remove the petitioner from service and terminating the services of respondent as directed by the Government respectively is IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI R. SURI BABU, NMR O/O THE DY. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ DN., NASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ DN., NASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER STATE OF AP REP BYPRL SECY PANCHAYAT 3 OTHERS, &RURAL ENGINEERINCHIEF PANCHAYATRAJ, ERRAM MANZIL, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ, NASARAOPET, THE DY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYATRAJ, SUB-DIVISION, ...RESPONDENT(S): 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be of Mandamus or rural Development 2006 issued by the 1st respondent and consequential 2006 issued by the 4th in so far as it relates to permission by the 1st respondent to ervice and terminating the services of the as directed by the Government respectively is 2 concerned is arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and issue consequential directions directing the respondents to forthwith reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits, arrears of salary and pass such other order or orders as it deems fit and proper. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WVMP 1164 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the "Interim Orders" granted in WPMP No.7647/2007 in WP NO. 5989/2007 dated 26-3-2007 and pass such other order or orders IA NO: 2 OF 2007(WPMP 7647 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of G.O.Rt.No.1761 Panchayat Raj & rural Development Department dt.12-12-2006 issued by the 1st respondent and consequential proceedings Rc.No.NMR/JA/94-95 dt.26-12-2006 issued by the 1st respondent and consequential Proceedings Rc.No.NMR/JA/94-95 dt 26-12- 2006 issued by the 4th respondent in so far as it relates to permission by the 1st respondent to remove the petitioner from service and terminating the services of the petitioner by the 4th respondent as directed by the Government respectively is concerned, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV 3 The Court made the following order: Sri S.Karunakar, learned counsel, representing Sri P.V.Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has not been in contact with him for a long time and despite best efforts, he could not find out the whereabouts of the petitioner. Parties must invariably remain in touch with their advocates during the pendency of their cases. If they fail to do so, their case may become infructuous, even though it might have continued otherwise. In view of the above, since the matter pertains to the year 2007 and the petitioner has not been pursuing the case through his advocate, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, if the petitioner is of the view that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 17.10.2025 MP 4 196 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 5989 of 2007 Dated: 17.10.2025 MP