Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APLICO10015262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT,I (Special OrI'gI-nal Jut-isdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONJBLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAIVIANENI RAMAKRiSHNA PRASAD Between.I T Chenna Reddy, son of late pedda chennappaJ Aged abolJt 66 years, Resident of 4/110, BesinepallI', Nagasamudram vIIlage, chennekothapalie MandaI, Sri Sathya sa,' DI'StriCt, Andhra pradesh. .n*Petitioner AND 1.The state of Andhra pradesh, Rep by Its Pr!.ncj-ple secretary, Revenue Department, secretariat, velagapudI|, Amaravatl', Guntur DI'StriCt. 2. The Djstrjct collector, sr[-sathya saj DistrI'C{. 3. The DI-Strl'Ct Surveyor, sri sathya sai DjstrI'Ct. 4 The Revenue DivisionaI Offl-cer, Dharmavaram Revenue Djvisjc,n, Dharmavaram, sri sathya sa,I District. chennekothapa"i MandaI Sn- Sathya saj DI|S{rjCt. \,r 5.The Tahsildar, ChennekothapaIIi MandaI Sri Sathya Sai District. 6.The MandaI Surveyor, `Chennekothapalli MandaI Sri Sathya Sai Distri;I. 7.The Station of H6use officer, chennekotha palli Police Station Sri Sathya Sai District, 8.G Meena Prasad, wife of G. Venkata Prasad, aged 60 years, P`esident of Door No. 8-4-371/B/76, PIot No. 76, Bala Nagar,. Ranga Redc!y District, State of Telangana,
".RespondeFTtS petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circuinstances stated in the Letter received from the Principal CI'Vil Judge (Junior Di`v'iSion), Dh`armavaram, Ananthapuram District, as' forwarded by the Pri'ncipa.i District Judge, Ananthapuram, Die. No. 4090 dated 01.07.2025 (both letters enclosed for your Lordships kind perusal), the High Court may be pleased tot consider , and grant extension of time for a further period of six (6) weeks time to dispose of lA. 302/2025 in OS. 355/2023, as directed by the Hon7ble Court tin .- WP No. 760 of 2025 on dated 27.01.2025 WRIT PETITION NO: 760/2025: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that'in.`the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high hanc!ed action of the respondents more particularly respondent no. 5 to 7 in interfering with the possessI'On Of Petitioner and threatening to dispossess him from the private land in survey no. 256-1C which is an ext`ent of Ac. 14.75 cents of Nagasamudram Village, Chennekothapalli MandaI, Sri Sathya Sai District under the guise of conducting the survey without issuing the mandatory notice as. prescribed under the AP Survey and Boundaries act 1923 and without considering the legal notice and objections dated 28.12.2024, Spandana
I..
I_ Complaint dated 30.12.2024 which I-S highly illegal and arbitrary and violation of principals of natural justice and consequently direc+I the respondents lllC,I tO conduct the survey without issuing any notice to the Petitioner arld|other neighbor land owners and without providing the opportunity Of hearing NO: 1 OF2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circllmstances Stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the [ligh court may be pleased [Q direct the respondents to consider the legal notice/OrJjeCtiOnS dated 28.12.2024 and the spandana complaint dated 30.12.2024 for conciucting survey in surve'y no. 256-1c which is an extent of Ac. 14.75 cents of Nagasamudram village, Chennekothapalli mandal, Sri Sathya Sai DistrI'Ct Pending disposal of the main Writ petition LEL2,--Q_ L2g2§ Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be Pleased tO direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment-of the petitioner land in survey no. 256-1C which is an extent of Ac.14.75 cerits , of Nagasamudram village, chennekothapalli MandaI, Sri Sathya Sai District, until the disposal of the civil suit in o.s No. 355 of 2023 on the file of Junior Civil Judge Court, Dharmavaram, Ananthapur District which is filed by the 8th respondent, Pending disposal of the main Writ petition Counsel for the petitI-Oner: SRI TALARI RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Responclent No.7.I GP FOR HOME The Court made the followl-ng order:
APHCo10015262025 lN THE HIGH COURT oF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI I (specI'aI OrI-g,-hal Jur,'sdI'Ction) [3328] \ TUESDAYTHE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRJ JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT Between.I
"A,Eco^HyET^::±66REDyDEYARSs?N oREs:nAE=TPED^DrA CT,EN_NAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 yEARS, RESIDENT oF 4/110,BES'NEPALLL NAGASAMUDRAM VILLAGE, CHENNEKOTHAPALLE MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SA' DISTRlcT, ANDHRA PRADESH .
i = _P±-I.ii=jo lh,I E,= AND 1 THE STATE oF ANDHFIA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PR'NC'PLE SEELCARGEATSuRDY',, AMARREAVvEANTTEGuNTDuERFADFsTTMRFcNTT' SECRETARIAT, 2 THE D!STR!CT COLL±-CTOP`, sRI' SATH'`y~A SAI DISTRlcT 3 THE D'STRICT SURVEYOR, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRjCT 4 THE REVENUE D'V'SIONAL OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM REVENUE DDl'sViSRl,OcNT' DHARMAVARAMj sRl SATHYA sA, DISTR'CTCHENNEKOTHAPAL" MANDAL SRI SATHYA sA' 5 THE TAHS!LDAR, cHENNEKOTHAF7ALL' MANDAL SRl SATHYA SAj D'STF{lCT. 6 THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, CHENNEKOTHAPALLI MANDAL SRI SATHYA SA' D'STRICT. 7 TsHTAET£OT#T:ORrSOAFTHHyOAuSSA= DOIFsF=RCIEcE+ CHEN N EKOTHA PALLl POLIC E ?TATIC>N SRI SATHviriS;ir Dvll±+=I=CK+. 8 G MEENA PFIASAD, WIFE oF G VENKATA PRASAD, AGED 60 yEARS RESIDENT OF DOOR NO 8-4-371/B/76, PLOT NO 76, BALA
_-. . , , -l ---I----:-+i- NAGAR, RANGA REDDYI DISTRICT, STATE OF TELANGANA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the petitioner:
1.TALARI RAJESWARl - counsel.for the Respondent(s):
1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.G JHANSI The Co,urt made the following:
ORAL ORDE I.A.No.3of2025in W.P. No.760 of 2025 Heard Sri Pathi Siva Prasad, learned lCounsel appearing on behalf of MS. Talari RaJ'eSWari, learned Counsel for the wri+ petitioner in w.p.No.760 of 2025 a,ld Sri K. Bhaga{ SinghI, learned ,A`ssistan.I Go\.Jernment PIeader for Revenue. 2. This Application is filed seeking extension of time fora further Period Of six weeks to dispose of I.A.No.302 of 2025 in O.S.Nc,.355/2023, pending on the file of the learned p.rincipa! civil .Judge (Junior Division,\J; Dharmavaram. 3. Facts of this case would indicate that in a writ petition bearing w.p.No.760 o`f\``2025, this Cc,urf had passed the Final Order on 27.01.2O25 issuing certain d\ections to the presiding off,cer deal,ng with the suit bearing Q.S.No.355/2023. The relevant portion Of the Order in W.P.NQ.760 of 2025 dated 27.01.2025 reads as'under: _ , - /,,,,,,,, / /I
"6. Upon filing of the Application, the Learned Judge is requested to consider the same on merit and in accordance with law and dispose of the same within a period c,f eight weeks from today. Both the parties are
directed to co-operate with the trial court in expeditious disposal of the Applications which are now sought to be filed." /
+>S ______~_-_--``--r-`.-----.-T=._==`=TTi€`-l-+*rv`*`S%3arful=~`=-.--€`..~~
4. Since the lnter'OCutOry Appl',catiOn bearing I.A.No.302 of 2025 .,n o.s.No.355/2023 could not be disposed Of Within the t'lme f|lXed by this Court v,'c/e order dated 27.01.2025 (in W.P.No.706 of--2025), the learned Presid'lng officer is seeking further extension of time by six nlore weeks.
5. Having COnSidered the request Of the learned Principal C',vil Judge (Junior Divislon), DharmaVaram, this Court is inclined tO extend the time aS sought for. Accord'lngly, this lnterlOCutOry AppllcatiOn |lS dlSPOSed Of granting six (o6) more Weeks for disposal Of LA,No.302 of 2025 in O.S.No.355/2023, pending on the f'"e of learned principal civil Judge (Junlor Divls,on), DharmaVaram, from the date Of COmmun'lCatiOn Of this Order.
6. Registrar (Judicial) iS directed tO COmmuniCate a COPY Of thiS Orderto the leamed principal clv" Judge (Junior D'1VISiOn), DharmaVaram, Wlthin two weeks from today.
7. With these Observations and directions, I.A.No.3 of 2025 Stands
disposed of| sJ;/_ M SRINIVAS REGISTRAR ASSl //TRUE_ COPY// oFFIC`,r=R t=c\-c® The Registrar Judicial, High Court Of Andhra PracjeSh The Principal DistriC,I Judge, AnantaPuram, AnantaPuram Distrlct The Pr'lnc'lpal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dh.arrrlaVaram` AnantaPuram District
4. The Principal Secretary, State Of Andhra PradeSh, Revenlle Department, Secretarlat, VealgaPudi, AlnaraVath'l, Glmtur District
5. The District Collector, Sri Satya Sat District
6. The District Surveyor, Sr'l Sathya Sai District.
7. The Revenue DivislOnal Officer, DharmaVaram Revenue D'lv'ls'lOnt DharmaVaram, Sri Sathya Sai District. ChennekOthaPa"I. Mandal sri sathya sai Distr'lct.
8. The Tahsildar, Chennekothapalli Mandal Sri Sathya Sai District.
9. The MandaI Surveyor, chennekothapalli MandaI Sri Sathya Sai District.
10. The Station of Hous? Officer, Chennekotha palli Police Station Sri Sathya Sai District.
ll. One CC to M/S. TALARI RAJESWARI, Advocate [OPUC]
12. One CC to M/S. G JHANSl, Advocate [OPUC] 13.Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High C(,urt of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 14.Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
15. Three CD Copies gSg _+-li-I ,.;I -.
HIGH COURT DATED:22/07/2025
ORDER IA3OF2025 lN/AND WP 760/2025 EXTENSION TIME ?3 _lUL 2025 curren+, SecI!aP *
"=-' -.,