1 2025:CGHC:27563 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8460 of 2018  Smt. Vimla Bai Yadu Wd/o Late Shri Bali Ram Yadu Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Marra And Post Marra, Tahsil Patan, Civil And Revenue District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Senior Account Officer P. F. N. 40 Office Of The Accountant General (Account/ Pension/ Fund), Near Zero Point, Near Vidhan Sabha, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. District Education Officer Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4. Block Education Officer Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 83 of 2019  Khamhan Lal Bijaura S/o Late Shri Ram Bijaura Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Kurmi Gudra And Post Darbar Mokhli, Tahsil - Patan Civil And Revenue District - Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, New Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Senior Account Officer P.F.N. 40, Office Of The Accountant General, (Account/pension/fund), Near Zero Point, Near Vidhan Sabha, Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. District Education Officer Durg, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.06.25 18:17:30 +0530 2 4. Block Education Officer Pantan District - Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Patil, Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25. 06.2025 1. The above captioned Writ Petitions involve common questions of law and facts therefore both were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The petitioner(s) have filed these petitions against the non payment of the amount of General Provident Fund (GPF). 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) would submit that the these matters are pertaining to the entitlement of GPF amount and calculation thereof. He would pray that these matters may be referred to the the High Power Pension Redressal Committee to decide the dispute involved in these cases. 4. On the Other hand, learned counsels appearing for the respondents would oppose. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 6. Taking into consideration the fact that disputed questions of facts are involved in these cases, therefore, both the matters are referred to the High Power Pension Redressal Committee to decide the dispute. The committee is directed to decide the entitlement of the petitioners after affording a due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and other interested parties within 3 a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 7. Office of Advocate General is directed to supply one copy of these petitions along with necessary documents to the said committee. 8. With the aforesaid observation(s), and direction(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant