Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43478 (CHH)

GULAB CHAND KARSH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/970/2025 · 2025-09-22

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:48875 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 970 of 2025 1 - Gulab Chand Karsh S/o Mahettar Lal Karsh, Aged About 46 Years, Currently Posted As Nagar Nigam Zone No. 04 R/o 5 Satyam Vihar Colony, Mini Tokji Road, Ward No. 68, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Applicant/Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through General Administration Discipline Municipal Corporation Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Municipal Corporation Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Dinesh Kumar Sinha S/o Jethuram Aged About 47 Years Posted In Office of Municipal Corporation Raipur As Executive Engineer At Zone No. 06 ... Non-applicants/Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Applicant/Petitioner : Mr. Sourabh Sonwani, Advocate For State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate. For Respondents No.2 : Ms. A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate, Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 23-09-2025 1. This is an application for restoration of WPS No.8581 of 2025 which has been dismissed for want of prosecution on 02-09-2025. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that due to unavoidable reasons he could not appear before this Court when the matter was called for hearing and therefore, WPS No.8581 of 2025 was dismissed for want of Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2025.09.23 19:04:58 +0530 2 prosecution. He would further submit that the matter pertains to appointment of the petitioner/applicant on the post of Sub-Engineer and the dismissal of the writ petition affects his future prospects, therefore, the writ petition may be restored to its original number. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respective respondents oppose the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant. 4. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in this restoration application, the same is allowed and the WPS No.8581 of 2025 is restored to its original number. 5. The MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil