Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43475 (RAJ)

SMT. KRASHNA HARDENIYA D/O LT. SHRI RAMGOPAL SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19092/2025 · 2025-12-05

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49636] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19092/2025 Smt. Krashna Hardeniya D/o Lt. Shri Ramgopal Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, Chikna Farsh, Karauli Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariatre, Jaipur 2. The Director Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan 3. The District Collector Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan 4. The District Education Officer (Secondary Education), Karauli Mukhyalaya Karauli Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “1.It is, therefore, Humble prayed that this writ petition filed by the present petitioner may kindly been allowed and the impugned order dated 19.11.2025 may kindly been quashed and set aside and further the respondent Authority may kindly been directed to take the appropriate action on the application submitted by the present petitioner and further directed to allowed the petitioner in nearby school, considering this fact that the petitioner is the Singal Women, in the interest of justice. [2025:RJ-JP:49636] (2 of 2) [CW-19092/2025] 2. Any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem fit in favor of the petitioners may also be awarded to the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /60