Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43472 (AP)

P Kariyappa v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/7970/2025 · 2025-08-06

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY JHE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER ' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ :PRESENT: Ty^ HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO ^ lA No. 2 OF 2025 IN CRLP NO: 7970 OF 2025 Between: 1. P Kariyappa, S/o P Sanna Thimmappa, Aged 53 years, R/o. H. No. 11- 3, D Gollahatti, Madakasira, Sri Sathya Sai District. 2. P Srinivasulu„ S/o Sanna Thimmappa, Aged 43 years, R/o. H. No. 11- 03, D Gollahatti, Madakasira, Sri Sathya Sai District. 3. P Murali Krishna, S/o Sanna Thimmappa, Aged 41 years, R/o. H. No. 11-03, D Gollahatti, Madakasira, Sri Sathya Sai District. 4. P Sridhar, S/o Sanna Thimmappa, Aged 39 years, R/o. H. No. 11-03, D Gollahatti, Madakasira, Sri Sathya Sai District. 5. P Priyanka, W/o P Murali Krishna, Aged 28 years, R/o. H. No. 11-03,D Gollahatti, Madakasira, Sri Sathya Sai District. Petitioner/Accused No. 1 to 5 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravati Respondent Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition imposed in CrI.P. No. 7970 of 2025 of this Hon'ble court i.e., "(iv)The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned once in a week i.e., on every Saturday between 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., till filing of the charge sheet and (v) The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 shall not leave the district limits without the express permission from the Station House Officer concerned". The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated 07.08.2025 made in CrI.P. No. 7970 of 2025 and upon hearing the arguments of MS. SUDHESHNA YAKKALA Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused(s) and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent/Complainant, the court made the following ORDER “Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Condition No.(iv) imposed on the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 in Crl.P.No.7970 of 2025, vide order dated 07.08.2025, is partly relaxed. directing the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 to appear before the Investigating Officer once in a month, i.e., on the first Saturday between 10.00 A.M. and 05.00 P.M., till filing of the charge sheet. Post the matter after one (01) week. SD/- K. KASIRAO ACHARi ASSlSm^|REG!STRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// For To, 1. The Station House Officer, Madakasira Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District. 2. One CC to Smt Sudheshna Yakkala, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT 4. One spare copy HIGH COURT DR.YLR.J DATED:06/10/2025 POST THE MATTER AFTER ONE (01) WEEK ORDER lA No. 2 OF 2025 IN CRLP NO: 7970 OF 2025 DIRECTION ' -o\\ ’i 1 0 OCT 2025 I C3 "St* ■‘i.