[2025:RJ-JP:51365] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13724/2025 Smt. Anju Saini W/o Sanjay Saini, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Near Shani Mandir, Barrod, District Alwar. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Ola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Anil Dev Kalla, Inspector, Kotwali, Ajmer. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 18/12/2025 1. The instant bail application is filed under Section 483 BNSS by the petitioner Anju Saini W/o Sanjay Saini aged about 31 years who was arrested by the police on 07.10.2025 in connection with the FIR bearing No.94/2024 registed with Police Station Kotwali Ajmer, District Ajmer on 07.05.2024 in respect of the incident dated 23.10.2024. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a lady, who has a small child and is behind the bars for a long time and she played no role in preparing any forged documents and that it was completely the fault of the e-mitra operator against whom she has already lodged a complaint/FIR before the respective authorities, counsel submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and she has not joined on the said post in [2025:RJ-JP:51365] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13724/2025] pursuance of the application which she submitted. Counsel submits that no investigation is required to be made and no recovery is to be made and charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take long time and by maintaining parity in respect of the other person who have already been enlarged on bail under the same selection process, counsel prayed that the present petitioner may also be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as the Investigating Officer present before the Court informed this Court that the petitioner prepared a forged mark-sheet of class-X from Delhi Board and therefore, the case was registered against her. However, they fairly stated the fact that she did not joined on the said post. 4. In respect of the similar selection process an FIR bearing No.52/2024 registered with Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar, was registered against one Hitesh Kumar, who also participated in the same selection process with the same allegations. He has been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while allowing his bail application No.12928/2025 vide order dated 14.11.2025. 5. Without making any comments on the merits of the case, this Court considered the fact that the petitioner is a lady and has a small child and is behind bars ever since 17.10.2025 and further the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has already enlarged the other persons on bail, who also participated in a similar selection process, and against whom an FIR in respect of the similar allegations was lodged. [2025:RJ-JP:51365] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13724/2025] Considering the nature of the allegations and maintaining parity with the other persons, who are already enlarged on bail in respect of the FIR involving the same selection process, this Court is inclined to enlarge the present petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-applicant - Smt. Anju Saini W/o Sanjay Saini shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.94/2024 registered at Police Station – Kotwali Ajmer, District Ajmer, provided she executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J KuD/Dushyant/s472