Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43467 (CHH)

RAM NIWAS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WP227/803/2022 · 2025-06-26

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:28479 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 803 of 2022 1 - Ram Niwas S/o Late Shri Ratan Singh Aged About 68 Years R/o House No. 65, Sector-56, Huda, District Gurgaon Haryana ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Law Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Sonu Gupta W/o Shri Deepak Gupta Aged About 46 Years R/o Pent House No. 42/1201, NRI Complex, Sea Woods Estate Nerul, Navi Mumbai (M.H.) 3 - Deepak Gupta S/o Mahavir Gupta R/o Plot No 07/27 And 08/27 Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Premlata Gupta R/o Plot No 07/27 And 08/27 Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Mahavir Gupta R/o Plot No 07/27 And 08/27 Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Anil Gupta S/o Mahavir Gupta R/o 4th Floor Prabhukutir, JVPD Scheme Road No. 05, Juhu Mumbai 7 - Smt. Sangeeta Gupta W/o Anil Gupta R/o 4th Floor Prabhukutir, JVPD Scheme Road No. 05, Juhu Mumbai 8 - Smt. Hemlata Gupta W/o Pravin Kumar Gupta R/o House No 26 Road No. 25, Punjabi Park, New Delhi 9 - Smt. Renu Gupta W/o Naresh Kumar Garg R/o House No 220, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi 10 - Smt. Madhu Gupta W/o Nilesh Kumar Gupta R/o C.C. Colony In Front Of Rana Pratap Bagh, New Delhi 11 - Smt. Sandhya Diwedi Than Posted As Police Incharge, Mahila Thana, Presently Posted As Incharge Police Station Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.06.28 12:57:46 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Virendra Verma, Advocate For Respondent No. 1/State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Government Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 27/06/2025 1. At the very outset, Mr. Virendra Verma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Recording the statement made by Mr. Virendra Verma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti