Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4346 (BOM)

AMOS SALOMAN KALE AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE REVENUE MINISTER AND ORS

PIL/85/2025 · 2026-09-04

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

56-PIL-85-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 85 OF 2025 Amos Saloman Kale and Another ...Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Yogesh Morbale, i/b. Ms. Seema Pawar for the Petitioners. Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondents-State. Mr. Kedar Lad, for the Respondent No.6. Mr. Chetan G. Patil, for the Respondent No.14. Mr. Sukhanand Rajaram Ranbhise & Mr. Daniel Gaikwad are present in Court. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : September 04, 2026. P. C. : 1. The grievance in the Public Interim Litigation petition was that the land, which was reserved for cemetery, has now been leased by Respondent No.13 to Respondent No.14. 2. The order dated 6th January 2026 records the statement of learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.14 that the said land will continue to be used for cemetery itself. 3. In view of the statement which is made by the Respondent No.14, the grievance of the PIL petition is addressed. The statement made is accepted as an undertaking to this Court. Gaikwad RD 1 of 2 56-PIL-85-2025.doc 4. The petition, therefore, stands disposed of. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Gaikwad RD 2 of 2 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date: 2026.09.07 12:15:20 +0530