[2025:RJ-JP:50017] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18893/2025 Jai Singh Sihag Son of Shri Moola Ram Sihag, aged about 59 Years, 10/35, New Housing Board, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankur Srivastava For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar with Ms. Pooja Sharma, AAAG for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, prayed that respondents may be directed to produce entire record pertaining to the case. On the basis of the record, pleadings and submissions, writ or direction in the following nature may be issued:- (i) that the writ petition may kindly be allowed and the impugned transfer order dated 23.11.25 passed by the respondent may kindly be quashed and set aside qua the petitioner and further the respondents be directed to continue the appellant at his present place of posting at Principal, Seth Bhagwandas Kejriwal Govt. Senior Secondary School, Bas Nanag, Jhunjhunu without any disturbance. (ii) If any order prejudicial to the interest of petitioner is passed during the pendency of the writ petition the same may kindly be taken on record and be quashed and set aside. (iii) cost of the petition be awarded in favour of the petitioner. (iv) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this [2025:RJ-JP:50017] (2 of 2) [CW-18893/2025] case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner." 2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after inquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GARIMA/203