IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY r TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY present JUSTICE Y. LAKSHIWANA RAO NOl1668_OF2P'I1 PRADESH AT AIWARAVATI OF MARCH FIVE the honourable dr CRIMINAL REVISION nAQc i I Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of CrPC the Order dated in C.C.No.186 of 2010 15.07.2011 passed in Crl.M.P.No.170 of 2011 file of the Principal Junior Civil on the Judge, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District. Between: - Mr.Sayyed Noor, S/o Kasim Presentiy, R/o Ponnuru Saheb, Aged 37 Guntur Dist. years, Occ; Auto Driver, petitioner/petitioner/accused AND The state of Andhra Pradesh. Court of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Hyderabad. -RESPONDENT N0.1 Shaik Mohammed Umar, R/o Chilakaluripet Town S/o Rahamah, & Mandat, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT NO. aged not known to the petitioner, 2/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT LA. NO: 1 OF CRLRCMP MO: 24smc,n^^| Petition under Section stated in the affidavit filed i 482 of erPC praying that in the ci in support of the petition, Circumstances fhe High Court may be / •T. pleased to grant stay of all further petitioner in C.C.No.186 of 2010 Judge, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent No.1 Counsel for the Respondent No.2 proceedings including appearance of the on:the file of the Principal Junior . pending final disposal of the CrI.R.C. SRI SRIGHARAN TELAPROLU Civil PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) SRI NUTHALAPATI KRISHNA MURTHY The Court made the following ORDER : • f i I""' 't- •: APHC010500942011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO; 1668/2011 V [3521] Between: Mr.sayyed Noor ...PETITIONER AND The State Of A P Another and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.NUTHALAPATI KRISHNA MURTHY The Court made the following Order: Sri B.K.Chakravarthy, learned ...RESPONDENT(S) I counsel representing Sri Sricharan Telaproly, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the petitioner namely Sayyed Noor, S/o. Kasim Saheb iIS no more. 2. Sri N.Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for respondent No.2 reported that he has no idea about demise of the petitioner. / 2 3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that C.C.No.186 of 2010 09.05.2018 by the learned Principal Chilakaluripet, Guntur District. representing the State was already dismissed on Junior Civil Judge 4. The revision was filed against the order passed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act dismissing the sending the disputed document to the expert. request for 5. In view of the fact that the Calendar Case itself was dismissed by the learned Trial Court revision petition. Therefore, this dismissed as infructuous. nothing remains in this revision petition has to be 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. SD/nVI.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division); Chilakaluripet District. Guntur % ■ ( 2. One CC to Sri Sricharan Telaprolu Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Nuthalapati Krishna Murthy Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCS to the Public Prosecutdr. High Court of Andhra Amaravati [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, Amaravathi 6. three CD COPIES Pradesh at High Court of Andhra Pradesh at SAM TAC 5. '• '.J; i, |i HIGH COURT DATED;07/03/2025 ORDER CRLRC.No.1668 of 2011 s 2UUN 2025 L w - Current section .'v ^^:s£^SpaTCV'?5-'^ (o DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS