Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43447 (RAJ)

MANOJ SHARMA S/O SHRI KEDAR NATH SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17546/2025 · 2025-11-17

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46579] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17546/2025 Manoj Sharma S/o Shri Kedar Nath Sharma, R/o B-310, Janta Colony Po Janta Colony, District Jaipur, (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Urban Development And Housing, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Director, Department Of Local Bodies, Jaipur. (Raj.). 3. Deputy Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Government Secretariat Jaipur. (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Pareek For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “(i) By issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to allow the merger of services of the petitioner in Local Self Department and also provide the rules and procedures of merger from one department to another. (ii) Any other appropriate writ, order or directions in the present facts and circumstances of the case, which are deemed just and proper by this Hon’ble Court may also be passed in favour of the petitioner” [2025:RJ-JP:46579] (2 of 2) [CW-17546/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring the order dated 02.02.2024 in SB CWP No.1665/2024 titled as Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submitted that petitioner was initially appointed as Live Stock Assistant in Animal Husbandry Department and since February, 2024 he is rendering service in Nagar Nigam Heritage Jaipur but now petitioner has requested to merge his services in Local Self Government. He further submitted that in past, Dr. Harendra Singh, who was working as Veterinary Officer in Animal Husbandry Department and after NOC his services were merged with Local Self Department. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation, with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /107