Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43444 (CHH)

SMT. BHAKTIN YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10887/2025 · 2025-09-17

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:48141 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10887 of 2025 1 - Smt. Bhaktin Yadav W/o Late Ghuran Ram Yadav Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Nawabandh, Tehsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. 2 - Basant Lal S/o Munna Lal Aged About 67 Years R/o Village Songara, Tehsil Pratappur, District Surajpur, C.G. 3 - Smt. Rajkumari Yadav W/o Late Nankoo Yadav Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Basantpur, Tehsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 4 - Smt. Sukhman Soyma W/o Late Kaila Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Ward No. 6 Jaman Basantpur, Tehsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 5 - Smt. Shaili W/o Late Sudama Ram Aged About 53 Years R/o Lalbahadur Shastri Ward Ramanujganj, Tehsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Work Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Chief Engineer Public Work Department Surguja Circle Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. 3 - Superintendent Engine Public Work Department Circle Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. 4 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department (Bha/road) Division Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 5 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department (Bha/road) Division Ambikapur, District Surguja, C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Swapnil Keshari, Advocate. For State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 18/09 /2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022]. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.19 11:26:28 +0530