IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.370 of 2008 Appeal under section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2008 in A.S.No.130 of 2005 on the file of V Additional District Judge (FTC), Guntur confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2005 in O.S.No.377 of 1994 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, Guntur District. Between: 1. Kola Mohan Rao, S/o. Veeraiah, Hindu, Occ: Cultivation, Undavalli (PC), Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District, Mangalagiri D.M.C. 2. Kola Siva Nageswara Rao, S/o. Naga Bhushanam, Hindu, Occ; Cultivation, Undavalli, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District, Mangalagiri D.M.C. ...Appellants/ Appellants/Defendants AND 1. Gudipudi Sri Rama Laxmamma (died), 2. Erraju Veerabrahmam, S/o. Narasimhachari, Hindu, Occ: Cultivation R/o. Sivalayam Street, Yadava Street, Vijayawada -1. ...Respondents/ Respondents/Plaintiffs Counsel for the Appellants : Sri Chetiuru Sreenivas Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri P. Vijaya Kiran The Court made the following: APHC010006602008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 37Q/2nnfi [3369] Between: Kola Mohan Rao (hindu) and Others ...APPELLANT{S) AND Gudipudi Sri Rama Laxmamma Died and Others Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.CHETLURU SREENIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.P VIJAYAKIRAN ...RESPONDENT THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT: ...RESPONDENT(S) I The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellants against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2008, passed in A.S.No.130 of 2005 the V Additional Distri^ Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 10.03.2005, passed in O.S.No.377 of 1994, the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur. . on the file of on Sri D.Srihari, learned counsel representing Sri Chetiuru Sreenivas 2. None appeared for the learned counsel for the appellants is present. respondents. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri D.Srihari, learned 3. counsel representing learned counsel for the appellants submits that the matter has become infructuous as the cause of action does not survive and hence, he requests this Court to close this appeal. 4. Recording the above submission, the Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. Sd/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The V Additional District Judge (FTC), Guntur, Guntur District, (with records if any) 2. The Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guntur, Guntur District. 3. One CC to Sri Chetiuru Sreenivas, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri P. Vijaya Kiran, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. (to dispatch the trial court records) 6. Three CD Copies TK Cnr HIGH COURT TK DATED:31/01/2025 JUDGMENT SA.No.370 of 2008 DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS