1 2025:CGHC:48476 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 5016 of 2025 Riverview Colony Awasi Samiti Through Its President Gorelal Dewangan S/o H.R. Dewangan Aged About 65 Yrs. R/o River View Colony, Koni, Near Govt. I.T.I. Koni, Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, Vikas Bhawan, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Building Officer Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - M/s. Shubham Developers, Through Its Partner Rajesh Sarkar, S/o Niranjan Sarkar, R/o Durga Bhawan, Dayalband Road Tikrapara, Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Tiwari, Advocate For State-respondent : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, PL For Municipal Corporation : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.09.22 18:32:02 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 22/09/2025 1. By way of this petition, petitioner sought following relief(s) : “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly pleased to call for the records of the case from the respondents authorities. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly pleased to issue an appropriate writ, directing the respondent authority to conclude, within a stipulated time frame, the proceedings initiated through notice dated 05.12.2022 (Annexure P/1), in line with the instructions provided in the order dated 22.07.2022 (Annexure P/8). iii. That, any other relief/order, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the cost of the petition, may be given.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended the this petition may be disposed of directing to respondents No.3 & 4 to decide the notice dated 05.12.2022 (Annexure P-1) as within a time frame. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents contended the concerned authority is ready to decide Annexure P-1 in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 3 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing to respondents No.3 and 4 to decide the notice dated 05.12.2022 (Annexure P-1) on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with rules, regulations and law and the same shall be decided after giving opportunity of hearing to respondent No.5. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 7. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant