[2025:RJ-JP:50812] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7472/2025 Nanda Ram S/o Shri Birda Ram, aged about 44 Years, R/o Baba Ramdev Mandir Ke Pass Village Bagrana, Agra Road, Jaipur Ra- jasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through PP 2. Mukesh Kumar Atal S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 182, Naya Bagrana, Kanota, Jaipur (East) Ra- jasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jhalani For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. Mr. Nonit Hatila HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 16/12/2025 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.329/2025 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) (Rajasthan), for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) & 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel submits that now, parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR [2025:RJ-JP:50812] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7472/2025] are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that in cross-FIR No.330/2025 registered in the same police station, verification report has been received which shows that parties have entered into compromise. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.329/2025 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /153