Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43420 (RAJ)

M/S KRISHNA GOPAL KALEDA AYURVED BHAWAN AGENCY v. M/S KRISHNA GOPAL AYURVEDA BHAWAN (DHARMARTH TRUST) TRUST

CMA/4795/2025 · 2025-12-16

Sangeeta Sharma, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50699-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.4795/2025 1. M/s Krishna Gopal Kaleda Ayurved Bhawan Agency, Near Railway Crossing Badgaon Beawar Road. Ajmer, Rajasthan Partnership Firm Through Partner. 2. Shri Narendra Kumar Khandelwal S/o Late Shri Shiv Charan Das Khandelwal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o M19, Sagar Vihar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer. 3. Shri Kishan Gopal Khandelwal S/o Shri Kalicharan Das Khandelwal, R/o 6/169, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Shri Keshav Khandelwal S/o Late Shri Girdhar Gopal Khandelwal, R/o M30, Sagar Vihar Colony Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Gaurav Khandelwal S/o Shri Narendra Kumar Khandelwal R/o M 19, Sagar Vihar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer ----Appellants Versus 1. M/s Krishna Gopal Ayurveda Bhawan (Dharmarth Trust) Trust, Office, F 15, 16, Industrial Area Parbatpura, Ajmer Through Chairman M/s Krishna Gopal Ayurveda Bhawan Dharmarth Trust Office, F 15, 16, Industrial Area Parbatpura, Ajmer 2. Honble Secretary, M/s Krishna Gopal Ayurveda Bhawan (Dharmarth Trust) Trust Office, F 15, 16, Industrial Area Parbatpura, Ajmer. 3. Additional Secretary, Ms/ Krishna Gopal Ayurveda Bhawan (Dharmarth Trust) Trust Office, F 15, 16, Industrial Area Parbatpura, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr.R.B. Mathur, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr.Mohit Khandelwal, Adv., Mr.Keshav Dadhich, Adv. & Mr.Pranav Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Ashish Saksena, Adv. with Mr.Harshit Mittal, Adv. HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Judgment 16/12/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime is not pressing this appeal and submits that he may be allowed to [2025:RJ-JP:50699-DB] (2 of 2) [CMA-4795/2025] move an appropriate application under Section 121 before the Commercial Court for seeking further directions. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. 3. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. 4. If any application is moved within fifteen days, the Commercial Court concerned is expected to decide the same as soon as possible preferably within a period of one month thereafter. 5. All pending applications stand disposed of. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ Himanshu Soni/23