Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43412 (RAJ)

SUNITA KUMARI JATAV DAUGHTER OF SHRI KAMAL MOHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19073/2025 · 2025-12-08

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49881] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19073/2025 Sunita Kumari Jatav Daughter of Shri Kamal Mohan, aged about 54 years, resident of Plot No.A-6, Bhairav Nagar, Opposite S.F.S. New Sanganer Road, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). Employee Id:RJJP200317005611. Presently working as Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Kheda Ladana, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Kheda Ladana, Jaipur. 4. Sanjay Tiwari, Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Jhujhanda, Beawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suray Prakash Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- "It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court be pleased to allow this writ petition and further be pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 29.10.2025 passed by the learned Tribunal and the impugned order dated 22.09.2025 passed by the respondents being illegal and arbitrary and the petitioner may kindly be permitted to serve at the present place of posting i.e. Govt. Sr. Secondary School Kheda Ladana Jaipur in interest of justice. Any other order which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner." [2025:RJ-JP:49881] (2 of 2) [CW-19073/2025] 2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after inquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GARIMA/205