1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10879 of 2025 1 - Tulsi Ram Todar S/o Hiralal Todar Aged About 48 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Middle School Shivtarai, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Harindra Kumar Singh S/o Shri Chandrika Singh Aged About 47 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Middle School Shivtarai, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Rita Singh W/o Gyanendra Singh Aged About 52 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Middle School Pataita, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Ashwani Kumar Lahre S/o Tamaskar Lahre Aged About 50 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Govt. Higher Secondary School Shivtarai, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Manoj Kumar Jaiswal S/o Shri Vijay Jaiswal Aged About 40 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Govt. Higher Secondary School Shivtarai, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Rajendra Kumar Verma S/o Late Kedar Nath Verma Aged About 62 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Govt. Middle School Shivtarai, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 7 - Ram Kumar Malhotra S/o Shiv Prasad Malhotra Aged About 50 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Govt. Higher Secondary School Shivtarai, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 8 - Meena Ekka D/o Ramnath Ekka Aged About 41 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Govt. Higher Secondary School Shivtarai, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri CJK Rao, Advocate. For State : Shri Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2025.09.12 18:23:41 +0530 2 12.09. 202 5 1. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of first and second Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of first Kramonnati and second Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. Petitioner is also entitle for first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the respondents No. 2 & 3/competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to respondents No. 2 & 3/competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No.261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents No.2 & 3/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of this case. It is for the respondents No. 2 & 3 to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 5. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder