KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI MUSADDI LAL SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17415/2025 · 2025-12-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43404 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43404 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50073] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17415/2025 Krishan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Musaddi Lal Sharma, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Plot No. B-126, Buddh Vihar, Alwar District Alwar (Rajasthan) At Present Residing At Flat No. -126, Ground Floor, Ags, Shalimar Extension, Alwar, District Alwar-301001 (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare, Jaipur, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. The Additional Director Pension And Pensioners Welfare, Udaipur, District Udaipur (Rajasthan)
4. The Director, Secondary Education Bikaner, District Bikaner (Rajasthan)
5. The District Education Officer, Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh, (Rajasthan)
6. The Deputy Director Secondary, Jaipur Division, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
7. The Chief Block Education Officer Begun, Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishna Kumar Chhawal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“i. To give service benefit from initial appointment dated 15.01.1991 from the post
[2025:RJ-JP:50073] (2 of 3) [CW-17415/2025] of 3rd Grade Teacher, the pension benefits thereof. ii. To give the Three A.C.P. benefits in service records and revise the service benefits accordingly. iii. To give/written amount of Rs.62,250/- which was recovered wrongly by the respondents during in service. iv. To count the proper length of service from the initial appointment i.e. 15.01.1991 and give grade pay difference according rules. v. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents, which this Hon’ble court deems Just, and proper in the circumstances of the case. vi. Cost of the Civil Writ Petition.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation.
After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the
[2025:RJ-JP:50073] (3 of 3) [CW-17415/2025] petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/227