1 2025:CGHC:46852 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10845 of 2025 1 - Ku. Shatrupa Jaiswal D/o Pitamber Jaiswal Aged About 29 Years Fisheries Inspector, Office Of Assistant Director (Fisheries), Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Fisheries Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Deputy Secretary Fisheries Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Fisheries Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Director Fisheries Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Deputy Director Fisheries, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri C Jayant K Rao, Advocate. For State : Shri Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 12.09. 202 5 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 30.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the office of Deputy Director, Fisheries, Bilaspur to the office of Assistant Director, Fisheries, Janjgir. However, vide corrigendum dated 15.07.2025 the said transfer order was amended to the effect that Deputy Director Fisheries be read as Assistant Director, Fisheries. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the said transfer order the petitioner has already made representation which is still pending before the transfer committee. As per Clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05.06.2025, there is in-house remedy for making Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2025.09.12 18:26:50 +0530 2 representation against the transfer order before the transfer committee who will consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. Clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05.06.2025 is reproduced as below: “8. स्थानांतरण से व्यथिथत शासकीय सेवक द्वारा अपने स्थानांतरण के विवरूद्ध अभ्यावेदन के वल स्थानांतरण नीतित के उल्लंघन होने पर ही उक्त उल्लंघन होने वाले कं ति$का के संबंध में स्पष्ट आधारों के साथ स्थानांतरण आदेश जारी होने की तितथिथ से 15 विदवस के भीतर प्रश्नाधीन स्थानांतरण आदेश की प्रतित सविहत शासन द्वारा गवि1त वरिरष्ठ सति4वों की सविमतित के संयोजक एवं सति4व, सामान्य प्रशासन विवभाग को प्रस्तुत विकया जा सके गा। सविमतित द्वारा ऐसे प्रकरणों का इस स्थानांतरण नीतित के प्रकाश में परीक्षण करने के पश्चात अपनी अनुशंसा संबतिधत विवभाग को प्रेवि=त की जाएगी।” 3. Be that as it may, since in-house remedy has been provided to the employee concerned to raise the grievances before the transfer committee against transfer order, this court deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to move fresh representation before the transfer committee along with copy of this order within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the transfer committee, in turn, shall take a decision on the representation so made by the petitioner in accordance with law in an objective manner and pass a reasoned order on its own merits within a further period of two weeks. Till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. 4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder