Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4340 (KER)

JILSHAD v. MUJEEB REHMAN

RP/338/2025 · 2025-04-04

C Pratheep Kumar

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R.P. No.338/2025 IN MACA 1790/2014 1 2025:KER:29466 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 338 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.1.2025 IN MACA NO.1790 OF 2014 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT: JILSHAD AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. SULAIMAN, AMBALAPPADI HOUSE, POST PERUMPALLY, PUTHUPPADY, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673586 BY ADVS. R.SUDHISH M.MANJU RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 MUJEEB REHMAN S/O. SAIDALAVI, MUKRIYAN HOUSE, PUTHUR POST, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 673636 2 ABDUL RASAK P. S/O. KUNHEEN HAJI P., PARENGAL HOUSE, VENNIYUR POST, KAKKAD, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676508 3 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER, NOOR COMPLEX, ARAYEDATH PALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673016 SMT.P.A.REZIYA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.P. No.338/2025 IN MACA 1790/2014 2 2025:KER:29466 O R D E R Dated this the 4th day of April, 2025 Admit. 2. This is a review petition filed by the appellant for reviewing the judgment of this Court in MACA. No.1790/2014 dated 16.1.2025 on the ground that in the judgment, this court omitted to add the medical bills worth Rs.29,644/- while awarding the compensation. 3. The learned Standing Counsel also fairly conceded that there occurred such a mistake. 4. Therefore, this review petition is allowed. The judgment dated 16.1.2025 is recalled. Sd/- C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JUDGE sou.