1 2025:CGHC:47957-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2928 of 2025 1. Nikahat Parveen W/o Mo. Ajaj Aged About 38 Years R/o Ali Kirana Store, Manjha Toli, Shankh Mode, P.S.- Raidih Distt.- Gumla (Jharkhand) 2. Abdul Majeed S/o Late Noor Mohammad Aged About 69 Years R/o Ali Kirana Store, Manjha Toli, Shankh Mode, P.S.- Raidih Distt.- Gumla (Jharkhand) 3 - Kamrun Nisha W/o Abdul Majeed Aged About 62 Years R/o Ali Kirana Store, Manjha Toli, Shankh Mode, P.S.- Raidih Distt.- Gumla (Jharkhand) 4 - Astarun Nisha W/o Firoj Ansari Aged About 42 Years R/o Naim Nagar Old Court, Durgapur, Distt.- Wardhman (West Bengal) 5 - Faiyaj S/o Abdul Majeed Aged About 38 Years R/o Ali Kirana Store, Manjha Toli, Shankh Mode, P.S.- Raidih, Distt- Gumla (Jharkhand) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home And Police Affairs, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. And Post Rakhi, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. And Post- Rakhi, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Superintendent Of Police Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 4. Police Station Mahila Thana Through - Officer Incharge, Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.09.19 10:18:08 +0530 2 5. Ishrat Parveen W/o Mo. Faiyaj Aged About 28 Years R/o Through Father Mujiburrahman Ward No. 28, Gaji Nagar Birgaon, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Badruddin Khan, Advocate For Respondents/ State: Mr. Soumya Rai, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 18/09/2025 1. Heard Mr. Badruddin Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Soumya Rai, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/ State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “A) It is, therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the F.I.R no 01/2022, Charge Sheet issued under section 498-A, 506, 406,34 of the IPC and 3 and 4 of Dowry Act and criminal proceeding 1818/22 pending before the JMFC Raipur Dist Raipur(C.G.) (B) That, the honble high court, being pleased, to quash cognizance order dated 4/3/22 passed by JMFC Raipur Dist Raipur(C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 3 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the State submits that charges has been framed on 17.05.2022, but the same has not been challenged. 4. At this point, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh with appropriate prayer. 5. Learned State counsel has no objection. 6. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 7. Certified copies of the documents, if any, may be returned to the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti