218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18811-2025 Date of Decision:30.07.2025 Nirmal Singh and Anr. …Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Gurmandeep Singh Dhillon, Advocate for Mr. K.S Brar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. ***** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to them in case FIR No.83, dated 16.06.2024, registered under Sections 307,458, 365,506,427,148,149 of IPC, Sections 325,326 of IPC added vide rapat No.09 dated 12.01.2025 and Sections 307,365 of IPC deleted vice rapat No.18, dated 27.01.2025 Police Station Sadar Faridkot, District Faridkot (Annexure P-1) 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 04.04.2025, the following contentions were noticed by this Court and the same have been reproduced below:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that while petitioner No.1 has been attributed baseball bat blow on the left elbow of Manjeet Kaur, which resulted in a fracture. Petitioner No.2 Ravi Singh @ Yakoob Singh has been attributed an iron rod HITESH 2025.07.30 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-18811-2025 -2 blow on the back of Manjeet Kaur and near the left ear of Bhajan Kaur, which injuries were opined to be simple in nature”. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioners have joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. Learned State counsel also submits that the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no longer required for further investigation. 5. Reply by way of an affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Faridkot has been filed on behalf of respondent-State and the same is taken on record. 6. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 04.04.2025 is made absolute. The petitioners shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioners shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 30.07.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.30 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh