Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43387 (PNJ)

RAJPAL RISHI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/16236/2007 · 2025-05-14

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 1081 Rajpal Rishi State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. whereby recovery was ordered. 2. the petition wherein the petitioner prayed for fixation of his pay at par with Sh. Jeevan Kumar Goel, Science Master (now lecturer) GSSS Sunam, regarding which Education Officer (SE) Mansa, Annexure P Officer, Faridkot, Annexure P decision thereon had been taken. 3. reply filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 6, dated 09.03.2009, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rajpal Rishi Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. S.K.Sharma Budhladawale, Advoca for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the orders whereby recovery was ordered. Learned counsel refers to the averments made in para 13 of the petition wherein the petitioner prayed for fixation of his pay at par with Sh. Jeevan Kumar Goel, Science Master (now lecturer) GSSS Sunam, regarding which he had submitted representations to t Education Officer (SE) Mansa, Annexure P Officer, Faridkot, Annexure P-12-A, dated decision thereon had been taken. Learned State counsel refers to the corresponding on behalf of respondents No.1 to 6, dated 09.03.2009, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16236-2007 (O & M) Date of decision: 14.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. S.K.Sharma Budhladawale, Advocate, Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the orders Learned counsel refers to the averments made in para 13 of the petition wherein the petitioner prayed for fixation of his pay at par with Sh. Jeevan Kumar Goel, Science Master (now lecturer) GSSS he had submitted representations to the District Education Officer (SE) Mansa, Annexure P-12, and the Circle Education A, dated 14.01.2006, however, no Learned State counsel refers to the corresponding para of on behalf of respondents No.1 to 6, dated 09.03.2009, wherein PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.15 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-16236-2007 -2- it has been stated that the petitioner ought to have represented to the Secretary, Department of Education, Punjab, 4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present case to enable him to submit the aforesaid representation. 5. Ordered accordingly. 14.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.15 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.