918-WP(ST)-16110-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (SR. NO.918) WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.16110 OF 2025 Snehal Suhas Parkhe & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.920) WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.16406 OF 2025 Vidya Hanumant Mahadik ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.921) WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.16408 OF 2025 Dipali Santram Dhavare ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.928) WRIT PETITION NO.12778 OF 2023 Deepika Kashinath Diwate ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.929) WRIT PETITION NO.279 OF 2024 Nutan Nivrutti Gore & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.930) WRIT PETITION NO.280 OF 2024 KARTIKEYA 1 of 5 918-WP(ST)-16110-2025.odt Vanita Narayan Gote @ Vanita Sanjiv Kunjir & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.931) WRIT PETITION NO.281 OF 2024 Karuna Gautam Thombare ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.932) WRIT PETITION NO.282 OF 2024 Pramodini Krushnaji Kulkarni ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.933) WRIT PETITION NO.1604 OF 2024 Shridhar Vasantrao Deshmukh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.934) WRIT PETITION NO.1605 OF 2024 Prashantkumar Namdev Sakhare & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.935) WRIT PETITION NO.7511 OF 2024 Manisha Arvind Katkar ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents KARTIKEYA 2 of 5 918-WP(ST)-16110-2025.odt AND (SR. NO.936) WRIT PETITION NO.8088 OF 2024 Vidya Kishor Karanje @ Vidya Baban Supekar ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.938) WRIT PETITION NO.17008 OF 2024 Santosh Ramhari Shete ...Petitioner Versus The Eduation Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Pune & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Rajaram Deshmukh a/w Ms. Ankita Salvi, Advocate for the Petitioner in all these Writ Petitions. Mr. S.P. Kamble, Advocate for the Respondent-State in WP(ST)/16110/2025. Ms. Devyani Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent-State in WP(ST)/16406/2025. Mr. Abhijeet Naik, Advocate for the Respondent-State in WP(ST)/16408/2025. Mr. V.G. Badgujar, Advocate for the Respondent-State in WP/12778/2023. Ms. N.M. Mehra, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP/279/2024 and WP/1604/2024. Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP/280/2024. Mr. R.A. Salunkhe, Advocate for the Respondent-State in WP/281/2024. Ms. Dhruti Kapadia, Advocate for the Respondent-State in WP/282/2024. Ms. P.M. Deshpande, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP/1605/2024. Ms. Priyanka Chavan, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP/7511/2024. Mr. K.N. Solunke, Advocate for the Respondent-State in WP/8088/2024. Mr. P.P. Kakade, Additional G.P. for the Respondent-State in WP/17008/2024. KARTIKEYA 3 of 5 918-WP(ST)-16110-2025.odt CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 7th MAY, 2025 P.C. :- 1. In all these matters, the grievance of the Petitioners is that their proposals for grant of approval to their appointments as Assistant Teachers in the Unaided / Aided Section of the school, are pending with the concerned Officer. Some of the proposals are pending since 2016 onwards. They seek a direction to the concerned Authority to decide the proposals, expeditiously. 2. The learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the Zilla Parishad / the AGPs appearing on behalf of the Education Officer Secondary, submit that as the proposals are pending for a long time, there is a possibility that some of the proposals may have already been decided. The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that none of these Petitioners have been served with any orders that may have been passed. 3. In view of the above, all these Writ Petitions are disposed off with the following directions to the Education Officer Secondary / Education Officer Primary :- KARTIKEYA 4 of 5 918-WP(ST)-16110-2025.odt (a) The pending proposals shall be taken up expeditiously by these Authorities and by following the due procedure laid down in law, they shall conduct a meticulous verification exercise of the records available and after giving an opportunity to the Management to remove deficiencies, if any, a reasoned order shall be passed in each of these proposals, if not already decided, within a period of 120 days from today. We caution the Authorities that they should start implementing this order expeditiously and we will not grant them extension of time. (b) In the event any orders have been passed, copies of the said orders shall be served upon the Management and the Petitioners, within a period of 21 days from today by Speed Post (AD). (c) If adverse orders have been passed or if they are passed within the timeline granted by this Court, the aggrieved parties are at liberty to avail of a remedy as is permissible in law. (d) In the event any proposal is accepted, further steps for grant of Shalarth ID shall be initiated expeditiously. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) KARTIKEYA 5 of 5