203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-16550-2006 Date of Decision: 23.09.2025 Jayanti Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Abhishek Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG, Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel representing the parties are ad idem that question of lien is pending before Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s).40820 of 2024 titled as ‘State of Haryana and Others Versus ASI Jagpal Singh and Others’. 2. Learned State counsel submits that benefit granted to private respondents has already been withdrawn, thus, grievance of petitioner qua benefit to private respondents stands redressed. 3. Learned counsel representing the parties are in tandom that outcome of aforesaid SLP would be applicable to the petitioner. 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent to consider claim of petitioner within three months from the date of adjudication of aforesaid SLP. It PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.23 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16550-2006 -2- would be the duty of the petitioner to bring outcome of aforesaid SLP in the knowledge of concerned authority. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 23.09.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.23 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document