[2025:RJ-JP:51504] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20246/2025 Gayatri D/o Megh Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Jheel Ka Pura, Basai Samanta, Tehsil And District Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jhalana, Institutional Area, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services Rajasthan Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of FHW with all consequential benefits as the petitioner secured more marks than the last cut off in OBC NCL Category. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the Impugned Order dated 16.07.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside. iii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed [2025:RJ-JP:51504] (2 of 3) [CW-20246/2025] to give same benefit as given in the case of SBCWP No. 17/2025 (Manju Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 06.01.2025 pursuant to which she was given appointment vide order dated 04.12.2025 and also given same benefit as given in the DBSAW No. 1145/2025 (State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Anuj Singh Parma) decided on 08.12.2025” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 06.01.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17/2025 titled as Manju Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Manju Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Manju Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if [2025:RJ-JP:51504] (3 of 3) [CW-20246/2025] petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /463