Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2025:CGHC:46333 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8624 of 2022
1. Krishna S/o Shri Dheluram Aged About 50 Years R/o. Village Birutola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
2. Radhelal S/o Jagalu Ram Aged About 50 Years R/o. Village Birutola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
3. Ramdular S/o Shri Parasram Aged About 48 Years R/o. Village Birutola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
4. Chhotu Ram S/o Prabhu Ram Aged About 50 Years R/o. Village Birutola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
5. Sohan Ram S/o Shri Pardeshi Ram Aged About 45 Years R/o. Village Birutola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
6. Deendayal S/o Shri Motiram Aged About 45 Years R/o. Village Birutola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
7. Naresh S/o Shri Hemlal Aged About 45 Years R/o. Village Birutola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
8. Pyare Lal S/o Shri Pardeshi Aged About 45 Years R/o. Village Birutola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
9. Dharmraj S/o Late Kanshi Aged About 52 Years R/o. Village Kohlatola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
10. Krishna S/o Late Pardeshiram Aged About 54 Years R/o. Village Kohlatola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
11. Kanta S/o Shri Laxman Aged About 45 Years R/o. Village Kohlatola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
12. Ajay S/o Ful Singh Aged About 45 Years R/o. Village Kohlatola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
13. Rajkumar S/o Shri Bodhiram Aged About 42 Years R/o. Village Mahratola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
14. Dhanu Ram S/o Mansha Ram Aged About 55 Years R/o. Village Mahratola, Tahsil And Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.09.12 18:41:51 +0530
2
2. The Executive Engineer Pipariya Project, Head Work, Water Resources, Sub Division, Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioners
: Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate For State : Mr. T.L. Bareth, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board
10.
09.2025
1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have sought the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to regularize the service of the petitioners forthwith. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem-fit and appropriate.”
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were appointed on the post of Labour and are working with the respondent authorities since 1982, but till date their services have not been regularized. He would contend that the issue involved in the present petition has already been dealt with by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Others reported in (2018) 8 SCC 238 and in the matter of Jaggo Vs. Union of India, SLP(C) No. 5580 of 2024 : AIR 2025 SC 296. He would contend that a direction may be issued to the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the petitioners in the light of the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in above referred cases.
3. On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State would oppose.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record.
5. Considering the limited prayed made by learned counsel for the petitioners,
3 this petition, at this juncture, is disposed of with a direction to respondents No. 1 and 2 to consider the claim of the petitioners pertaining to regularization in the light of judgments passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matters of Narendra Kumar Tiwari (supra) and Jaggo (supra). The entire exercise shall be completed by the respondent authorities expeditiously preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction(s) and observation(s), the petition is disposed of. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge $iddhant