IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 2fi OF 2003 Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC i the decree and Judgment dated 28.10.2002 passed file court of the Senior Civil Judge, Bapatia, Guntur District, and Judgment, dated 20.02.2002 passed in OS No. 282 of 2001 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Bapatia, Guntur District Between: against the order dated against in AS No.66 of 2002 on the reversing the Decree 1. Mallempati Sampurnamma (Since died) per L Rs KpX sU-isr ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT Srturorstrict'' R/o.Appikatla Village Bapatia R/o.Railpet Bapatia AND Mandal 2. Kurra Lakshmi Prasanna, W/o.Dasaradha Ramaiah Guntur District. ...RESPONDENTS/ APPELLANT PLAINTIFF 2"^^ Defendant Counsel for the Appellants Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following: : SRI. V VENKATARAMANA SRI. SRINIVAS MANTHA APHC010076422003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 26/2003 Between: Mallempati Sampurnamma ...APPELLANT AND ...RESPONDENT{S) Koya Jaya Rani and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1.VVENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SRINIVAS MANTHA The Court made the following JUDGMENT: This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/1®* defendant under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 28.10.2002 passed in A.S.No.66 of 2002 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Bapatia, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 20.08.2002 passed in O.S.No.282 of 2001 on the file of learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge’s Court, ^apatla. The appellants 2 to 4 were brought on record as Legal Representatives of 1®* appellant vide order dated 02.03.2006 in SAMP.No.232 of 2006. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of either side. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 1. 2. 3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, seems that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. It 5. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. SOI- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR < 1 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, ■1 ? .j» 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Bapatia, Guntur District, (with Records) 2. The I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Bapatia, Guntur District. 3. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 4. One CC to Sri V Venkataramana Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Srinivas Mantha Advocate |OPUC] 6. Three CD Copies Psr GSC ^ . HIGH COURT DATED:03/02/2025 X 311 MAY 2025 Citfftiuoecuoii m ORDER SA.No.26 of 2003 DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR DEFAULT