CWP-10039-2025 (O&M) 141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Krishan Kumar Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondents. SUDHIR SINGH Present nature of Mandamus amount deposited by the petitioner till actual physical possession is offered to the petitioner, as per clause 7 of the (Annexure P-1) 2. At the outset, l petitioner would be satisfied, in case, representation same is decided 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Krishan Kumar versus Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondents. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition herein, inter alia andamus directing the respondents to amount deposited by the petitioner till actual physical possession is offered to the petitioner, as per clause 7 of the allotment letter dated 12.08.2016 1). At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner petitioner would be satisfied, in case, he is representation before respondent No.1 for redressal of his grievance, same is decided, expeditiously. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10039-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: April 07, 2025 ….Petitioner others ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR for the petitioner. Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondents. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ in the respondents to pay interest @ 9% on the amount deposited by the petitioner till actual physical possession is offered to allotment letter dated 12.08.2016 earned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is granted a liberty to make a for redressal of his grievance, and the 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s in the pay interest @ 9% on the amount deposited by the petitioner till actual physical possession is offered to allotment letter dated 12.08.2016 submits that to make a and the MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-10039-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that in case, the petitioner makes a representation for redressal of his grievance, the same will be looked into by respondent No.1 and it shall take decision either way, on such representation. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a representation before respondent No.1 for redressal of his grievance, and respondent No.1 is directed to consider and pass an appropriate reasoned order, on such representation, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of filing of such representation. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE April 07, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment