Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43364 (ALL)

SHASHI DHAR UPADHYAY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/31588/2016 · 2025-02-07

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 31588 of 2016 Petitioner :- Shashi Dhar Upadhyay Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Matter is listed under the heading of cases likely to have become infructuous (efflux of time). Matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears to press the writ petition. Names of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the respondent are shown in the cause list. It is evident that the petitioner does not have any interest in prosecuting the writ petition, as the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Dhananjai Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad