LEGAL HEIRS OF ARJANBHAI UKABHAI v. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR
CA/4603/2025 · 2025-09-09
Mool Chand Tyagi, Sangeeta K Vishen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4336 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4336 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C/CA/4603/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/09/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 4603 of 2025 In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 19539 of 2025 ========================================================== LEGAL HEIRS OF ARJANBHAI UKABHAI & ORS. Versus SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: HIMANSHU J AMIN(7787) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,1.6 MS ARCHANA U AMIN(2462) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,1.6 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 ==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Date : 09/09/2025 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN) By this application, the applicants have prayed for condoning the delay of 60 days in preferring the captioned appeal.
2. Mr Himanshu J. Amin, learned advocate for the applicants has made submissions along with the lines of the averments made in the captioned application.
3. Mr Vatsal Patel, learned advocate for Mr Varun K. Patel, learned advocate for the respondent no.2, so also Mr Siddharth Rami, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.1, have requested to pass appropriate orders.
4. Issue rule, returnable forthwith. Mr Siddharth Rami, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule on
C/CA/4603/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/09/2025 behalf of the respondent no.1 and Mr Vatsal Patel, learned advocate for Mr Varun K. Patel, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent no.2.
5. Having regard the averments, so also the submissions made, the delay of 60 days deserves to be condoned. Civil Application succeeds and is accordingly, allowed. Rule is made absolute. No
order as to costs.
(SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J) (MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J) RAVI P. PATEL Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: RAVI PRAVINCHANDRA PATEL(HC01068), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/09/2025 15:55:29