[2025:RJ-JP:44361] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16608/2025 Mangee Lal Meena S/o Sh. Revtee Prasad Meena, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Manota Kalan, Deeg (Raj.), Presently Posted As Tehsildar, Naugawan, District- Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. Registrar, Revenue Department, Rajasthan, Ajmer 3. District Collector, Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dikshant Jain for Mr. Akhil Simlote For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/11/2025 1. Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Instant writ petition is preferred by the petitioner with following prayer:- “i. Call for the entire record of the case and examine the same; ii. Quash and set aside the impugned order dated 27.10.2025 qua the petitioner by which the petitioner has been transferred and has been relieved and the respondents be directed to allow the petitioner to join the duties on the same post on which he was working prior to passing of the impugned order. iii. Any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of petitioners. Costs also be awarded.” [2025:RJ-JP:44361] (2 of 3) [CW-16608/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the date of birth of petitioner is 20.05.1967 and he will attain the age of superannuation on 31.05.2027, and the petitioner will retire in less than two years. He also submits that by impugned order dated 27.10.2025, the petitioner has been transferred from Tehsildar, Naugawan, District Alwar to Tehsildar, Election, District Bhilwara. 4. He has placed reliance upon the judgments passed by this Court in case of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15798/2025 : Dhanne Singh Bhamu Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. with connected matters. 5. Learned AGC submits that the petitioner has been transferred due to administrative exigency but considering the grievance as raised by the petitioner, the petitioner is free to make a representation to the Department, which will consider the representation on the grounds raised by the petitioner and this petition can be disposed at this stage. 6. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is apparent on record that the present petitioner is going to be superannuated on 31.05.2027, which is less than two years, therefore, it is appropriate to disposed of this writ petition at this stage, with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation. 7. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days [2025:RJ-JP:44361] (3 of 3) [CW-16608/2025] from date of receipt of representation, in light of grounds as referred hereinabove. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 8. In the meanwhile, impugned order dated 27.10.2025 qua the present petitioner shall remain stayed till disposal of the representation, by the respondents. 9. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/195