[2025:RJ-JP:51641] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17647/2025 Dr Anita Kumari W/o Shri Pradeep Kaswan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Mandawa Road, Opposite Rajasthan Girls School, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan- 333001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher And Technical Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner, Commissionerate Of College Education, Block-4, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 4. The Principal, Government College, Mandrayal, District Karauli. 5. Dr. Meena, D/o Asharfi Lal Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Dabhanw, Post Dandi Bajar, , Rewa Road, District Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Madhusudan Singh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- (i) by issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed to continue the services of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Professor at Government College, Mandrayal, District Karauliunder the Vidya Sambal Yojanaand allow the petitioner to discharge her duties in accordance with the [2025:RJ-JP:51641] (2 of 3) [CW-17647/2025] advertisement dated 29.06.2025 issued by the Commissionerate of College Education, Jaipur: (ii) by issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature thereof, direct the respondents to forthwith reinstate the petitioner to her post as Assistant Professor at Government College, Mandrayal, District Karauli, in place of the respondent no.5; iii) by issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature thereof, direct the respondents to pay to the petitioner the salary, honorarium, and all consequential benefits for the period during which she was unlawfully prevented from performing her duties as Assistant Professor; (iv) By issuance of a writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature thereof, restrain the respondents from engaging or continuing any other person in place of the petitioner on the said post, in contravention of the advertisement dated 29.06.2025; 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the [2025:RJ-JP:51641] (3 of 3) [CW-17647/2025] petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /140