SMT VEENITA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/27315/2023 · 2025-05-12
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43344 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43344 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:79084 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27315 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt Veenita And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hemant Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Sri Hemant Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the cause of action for filing the instant writ petition has become infructuous, and therefore, it may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 13.5.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad