Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43329 (AP)

Smt. Kondreddy Ammani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5978/2022 · 2025-03-06

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATU (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 5978 OF 2022 - Between: Smt. Kondreddy Ammani, W/o. Narayana Reddy, Aged about 71 years, Occ: Agriculture & Housewife, R/o. D.No. 1-4-429, Ankalammapeta Village Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. The District Collector, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District. The Tahsildar, Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Zonal Manager, District Office, YSR Kadapa District. 1. 2. 3, 4. 5. ...RESPONDENTS- Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ and Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents authorities in trying to dispossess the petitioner from her land admeasuring Ac.5.10 cents situated in Sy.No.95/1 of Rachumarripalli Village, Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law and further declare the action of the 4th respondent in allotting the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac.4.94 cents in Sy.No.95/ 1 without issuing any notice for such acquisition is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, contrary to law and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same and direct the respondent authorities not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land admeasuring Ac.5.10 cents situated in Sy.No.95/ 1 of Rachumarripalli Village, Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from her land admeasuring Ac.5.10 cents situated in Sy.No.95/1 of Rachumarripalli Village, Pulivendula Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR REVENUE — Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM, SC FOR APIIC The Court made the following: ORDER r * APHC010098942022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3505] (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 5978/2022 Between: Smt. Kondreddy Ammani ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.J JANAKIRAM! REDDY Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to approach competent Court. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to approach competent Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. 2. 3. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// yir" To SECTION OFFICER 1. One CC to Sri J. Janakirami Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. TwoCCsto GPforRevenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. One CC toSri J. Ugranarasimha, SCforAPIIC (OPUC) 4. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:07/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.5978 of 2022 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS