Chevuturu Venkateswarlu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/8249/2014 · 2025-01-23
K Manmadha Rao
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43324 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43324 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No.: W.P.No.8249 of 2014 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl.No DATE
ORDER NOTE
13.02.2026
NV, J
Rev.I.A.No.1 of 2025
Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the present application is filed seeking to review the final order dated 24.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.8249 of 2014.
Learned counsel for the respondents expressed no objection for the same.
Considering the submissions made and in view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this application is allowed by modifying the para No.9 of the
order of this Court dated 24.01.2025 passed in
2
W.P.No.8249 of 2014. The modified para No.9 of the order reads as follows:
“9. Having regard to the
facts and circumstances of the case and on considering the submissions of both the learned counsel, this Court is of the opinion that, as the Special Leave Petitions (SLP’s) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court were dismissed, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present writ petition with the following directions: i. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are hereby
directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 28.02.2008 for extension of quarry lease in an extent of 3-000 Hectares in Survey No.55/5 of R.L. Puram Village, Chimakurthy Mandal, Prakasam district and pass appropriate orders, within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”
Registry is directed to carryout the
3
necessary amendments/corrections and issue modified copy of the order to the parties concerned, accordingly. _________
NV,J
BSP/TPS