1 2025:CGHC:44473 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9442 of 2023 1 - Kanhaiya Lal Banjarey S/o Late Shri Ramlal Banjarey Aged About 56 Years Presently Posted As- Sub Divisional Officer (Substantive Post Assistant Engineer) At Sub Division Officer Hasdeo Right Bank Canal Water Management Sub Division No. 5, Jarve, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Water Resource, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Engineer In Chief Water Resource Department, Shivnath Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Engineer Minimata (Hasdeo) Bango Project Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintending Engineer Hasdeo Project Circle, Rampur/ Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Engineer Hasdeo Barrage Water Management Division, Rampur / Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sub Divisional Officer Hasdeo Barrage, Water Management Sub ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 Division Darri, Rampur / Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 7 - Nayan Ranjan Chaudhari Assistant Engineer, Posted In The Office Of Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Barrage, Water Management Sub Division Darri, Rampur / Korba, Distt. Korba, C.G. Presently Attached At Hasdeo Right Bank Canal Water Management Divisional Office Rampur / Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pritam Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/09/2025 1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena