Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
123
PUNEET SINGH
STATE OF PUNJAB
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr
Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab
MANISHA BATRA
1. The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for direction to the official respondent 11.10.2024 (Annexure P
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner ha (Annexure P- Commissioner present petition but the same has not yet been considere been taken thereon. be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to Commissioner 11.10.2024 (Annexure P thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M Date of decision:
PUNEET SINGH
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab
**** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short- the official respondent No.2 to Annexure P-8) and dated 10.12.2024 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has titioner has recently filed representation -8) and dated 10.12.2024 (Annexure P Commissioner of Police, Amritsar raising his petition but the same has not yet been considere been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to of Police, Amritsar to decide the representation 11.10.2024 (Annexure P-8) filed by the petitioner and take
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.19300 of 2025 Date of decision: 07.04.2025
…. Petitioner
…. Respondents MANISHA BATRA
, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya -‘BNSS’) seeking issuance of to decide representations dated 8) and dated 10.12.2024 (Annexure P-9). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted recently filed representations dated 11.10.2024 8) and dated 10.12.2024 (Annexure P-9) before the grievances as mentioned in the petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. 2- decide the representation dated filed by the petitioner and take necessary action Bharatiya seeking issuance of dated submitted dated 11.10.2024 before the in the d and no action has petitioner would - dated necessary action Jyoti 2025.04.07 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM
3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms.
Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to her
5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petit of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of one month from with law. 07.04.2025 Jyoti-IV
CRM-M No.19300 of 2025 Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petit of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 11.10.2024 (Annexure P one month from today, by passing a speaking order in
(MANISHA BATRA)
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No
M No.19300 of 2025 -2- Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid 11.10.2024 (Annexure P-8) of the petitioner within a today, by passing a speaking order in accordance (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in Court, has he paperbook be , without
disposed the aforesaid of the petitioner within a accordance Jyoti 2025.04.07 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document