Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43316 (AP)

Kundurthi Ramesh Chandra Sekhar, v. Sistla Venkata Subba Lakshmi Prasannam,

CRP/93/2024 · 2025-10-16

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010011762024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 93/2024 Between: 1. KUNDURTHI RAMESH CHANDRA SEKHAR,, S/O LATE K.RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-11-20, SAI KARTHIKEYA RESIDENCY, MALLADI VARI STREET, SINGH ROAD X ROAD, NAZERPET,TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SISTLA VENKATA SUBBA LAKSHMI PRASANNAM, W/O. ATCHYUTHADEVARAYA SARMA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 22-13-4, KOTHAPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SISTLA YAGNANARAYANA SASTRY, S/O. ATCHYUTHADEVARAYA SARMA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 22-13-4, KOTHAPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of Civil Revision Petition to this Hon'ble Court against the orders passed in RCA.No. 1/2021 on the file of the Court of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal-cum-Principal Senior Civil Judge,Tenali, dt.07.12.2023 reversing orders passed in IA.No.515/2018 in RCC.No.3/2018 on the file of the Court of the Rent Controller cum Principal Junior Civil Judge,Tenali,dt.09.02.2021 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 2 VS,J C.R.P.No.93 of 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in RCC.No.3/2018 on the file of the Court of the Rent Controller cum Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tenal pending disposal of the above CRP and grant Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V L N SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SWAPNA PRIYA CHAKKILAM The Court made the following: 3 VS,J C.R.P.No.93 of 2024 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 93/2024 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, in view of the subsequent developments that occurred during the pendency of the present Civil Revision Petition, the relief sought in the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:17.10.2025 JLV 4 VS,J C.R.P.No.93 of 2024 220 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 93/2024 Date:17.10.2025 JLV