Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43315 (AP)

Prathapaneni Lakshmi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/25560/2024 · 2025-04-07

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

r ^ U I ^ [ 3459 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) »• O TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE o >1 V! ”0 a 5 H PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAIVt WRIT PETITION NO: 25560 OF 2024 Between: Prathapaneni Lakshmi,, W/o. P.Narendra Naidu, Aged about 40 years, F.P.Shop No.1012014 Dealer R/o. D,No.1-14, R.Mailavararn, Renigunta, Tirupathi, Tirupathi District. ...PETITIONER ( AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Village Amaravati. 1. 2. The District Collector, Tirupathi District Tirupathi 3. The Joint Collector, Tirupathi District Tirupathi 4. Tl|ie Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikalahasti Tirupathi Tirupathi District 5. The Tahsildar, Renigunta Mandal Tirupathi District 6. The Village Revenue Officer, R.Mailavararn Village, Renigunta Mandal Tifupathi District ...RESPONDENTS Petition tinker Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not disbursing the essential commodities to the F.P. Shop No. 1012014 duly authorized held by the petitioner at R Mallavaram Village Renigunta Mandal District even when the authorization i to be Tirupathi valid and subsisting, without IS assigning any reasons is as per illegal, manifestly arbitrary irrational. . unreasonable. perverse, unfair, biased, preposterous, whimsical, capricious, unconscionable, unconstitutional besides being violative of Principles of Natural Justice besides being opposed to the very spirit and object of under Article:^14, Pradesh State Targeted a consequential run the F.P. Shop No. 1012014 by duly Justice and Fair- play and Fundamental Rights guaranteed 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Andhra Public Distribution System Control Order 2018 and for direction to permit the petitioner to allotting essential commodities lA NO: 1 OF 2094 Petition under Section 151 CPC is fiied praying that in support of the petition, the High respondents to forthwith disburse the essential commodities to the F.P. Shop No. 1012014 for supply to the public. ^ Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI; VIVIR Counsel for the Respondents; GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i Court may be pleased to direct the LEGAL APHC010495582024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25560/2024 [3459] Between; prathapaneni Lakshmi ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following: / 9 JS.J IVJ-’ No.25560 of2024 ORDER; The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief; M^nH ^ particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents In not ^ essenf/a/ commodities to the F P Shoo 0 2014 duly authorized to be held by the pettiioner at R.Mallavaram Village, Renigunta Mandal when the authorization is valid and subsisting, without assianlna any reasons IS as per illegal, manifestly arbitrary unreasonable irrational, perverse, unfair, biased, prepostelus hTsTlial capricious unconscionable, unconstitutional besides beina v,olot,ve of Principles of Natural Justice besides be ng oppZri to the very spinl and object of Justice and PaLiav and Fbndamer^tai Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19 anLTof PMc^n f Pradesh State Targeted Public Distnbution System Control Order 2018 and for conseguentmt direction to permit the petitioner to run the andfoZsT n d A oommodWes Zei f t , Court deems fit in the merest ofjustice and in the circumstances of the Tirupatbi District even a case. IS taken up for consideration, learned Assistant submits that the respondents commodities to the petitioner’s fair price 2. When the matter i Government Pleader for Civil Supplies are allotting the essential shop No.1012014. 3. In view of the same hence, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no further orders are required in this matter, no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. / Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTIONI OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. VMR LEGAL Advocate [OPUC] 2. TwoCCsto GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies «*; ■■ z4 HIGH COURT DATED:08/04/2025 ORDER 5 2 2 SEP 2025 VVP.No.25560 of 2024 ^ Current beciion ★ the writ petition IS CLOSED WITHOUT COSTS