HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: WP(C) No. 2228/2025 Mevish Jan and Anr. ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- None. Vs U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 25.08.2025 This Court vide order dated 14.08.2025 granted interim protection to the petitioners, subject to the production of age proof document with respect to the age of the petitioner No. 1 with the rider that interim direction shall only be extended in the eventuality of production of sufficient documentary proof with respect to the age of petitioner No. 1 on the date fixed. It was also made clear by virtue of the aforesaid order that in case document with regard to the age proof of petitioner No. 1 is not produced before the Court on the date fixed, interim direction shall stand vacated. Pursuant thereto, the matter was listed on 20.08.2025, on which date, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was adjourned for today. Sr. No. 10 2 | P a g e WP(C) No. 2228/2025 Today, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners nor the order dated 14.08.2025 passed by this Court has been complied with. In the aforesaid backdrop, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition which is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 25.08.2025 Mihul Mihul Singh 2025.08.28 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document