Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4330 (JHR)

PAWAN ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./913/2025 · 2025-02-27

Rajesh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.913 of 2025 ---- Pawan Oraon, aged 31 years, S/o Sri Mangra Oraon, R/o Village Gadha Kechki, P.O & P.S. Bishunpur, District-Gumla …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Adv. For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, A.P.P. ---- 04/Dated: 27th February, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant, who is in custody since 26.07.2023, has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T Case No.242 of 2023, arising out of Bishnupur P.S. Case No.33 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, Gumla. 3. The prayer for bail of the applicant was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 23.02.2024 passed in B.A No.10920 of 2023. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the applicant has been roped in the present case only on the basis of the suspicion. Except suspicion and confession, there is no other material against this applicant. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been renewed. 5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the nature of crime, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the applicant stands rejected once again. 7. However, the applicant is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail, if the trial is not concluded within six months. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Raja/- Uploaded