No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 2227 of 2025 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant (through V.C.). 2. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The applicant – Rohit Rana, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/ Case Crime No. 190 of 2025, under Sections 109 of BNS and 3/ 25 of Arms Act, registered at P.S.- Gangnahar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. 4. In this case, an FIR was lodged on 12.05.2025 by the informant under Sections under Sections 109 of BNS and 3/ 25 of Arms Act. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case; that applicant is languishing in jail since 12.05.2025; that applicant is not involved in the alleged assault and he has not fired on the Police party as alleged; that the recovered pistol does not belong to the applicant; that as alleged, applicant had unused cartridges of 8mm while the cartridge which was fired on the Police party was of 9mm. 7. Per contra, learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application and would submit that the offence alleged is of a grave and heinous nature; that the involvement of the applicant is well established in commission of crime from the investigation and the Investigating Officer on the basis of credible material evidence has filed the chargesheet against the applicant; and, that FSL report also supports the prosecution story. Therefore, the present bail application is liable to be dismissed. 8. Since, perusal of the content of the FIR and Sections of the FIR reflects the offence to be of very serious and heinous nature and Police party itself have recorded their statements under Section 180 of BNSS and have supported the prosecution case and furthermore FSL report also supports the prosecution story, this Court is of the view that there is no good ground to enlarge the applicant on bail at this stage and the present bail application deserves to be rejected. 9. The present bail application is rejected. ( Alok Mah r a J.) 11.03.2026 Ujjwal