IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31662 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1161 Year-2023 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ranjeet Sahani Son of Babu Lal Sahani Resident of Village - Bhalua, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjana Srivastava, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 15-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 1161 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 272/273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a), 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered total 68.100 liters of illicit Nepali liquor kept in three sacks. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. There is a non- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31662 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner has three criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 27.02.2025 without any rhymes or reason. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner again submits that the co-accused namely Satish Sahani has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 07.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 29067 of 2025. 6. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 1161 of 2023. rishi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T